ترجمة

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

4:30 AM

Maximizing Speed: How Aerobic Endurance Training Enhances Sprint Swimmers' Performance









Hey swimmers and coaches!

I've got an important topic to discuss today that could be a game-changer for sprint events - harnessing the power of aerobic work as most of the thoughts about the 50m races its only Anaerobic work.


I know sprinters and coaches usually focus on anaerobic power. However, research shows the aerobic system contributes 20-25% of the energy during those intense 20-second races like the 50 free (Medbø et al., 1988). This study reveals that during short bursts of intense exercise lasting 15-30 seconds, the aerobic system can make up a substantial 20-30% of the total energy production. Imagine the impact this could have on your sprint performance!


For elite sprinters doing 20-second sprints, the aerobic system still provides around 25% of their energy even when anaerobic metabolism dominates (Bangsbo et al., 1990). That shows the endurance capacity even in short explosive bursts. Elite sprinters were the focus of this research, which highlighted that even during 20-second sprints, where anaerobic metabolism usually dominates, the aerobic system still contributes around 25% of the total energy production. Endurance power in short, explosive efforts - a game-changer indeed!


The different energy systems intricately interact to fuel maximal efforts like sprinting (Gastin, 2001). So, coaches and swimmers, this means aerobic fitness is crucial for sprint dominance!


That extra 20-25% aerobic boost could be the difference between victory and defeat when races are decided by tenths and hundredths of seconds. Make sure sprint workouts incorporate aerobic development too.


The Takeaway:


For our young and enthusiastic swimmers, this means paying attention to your aerobic game is just as crucial as perfecting your strokes. The tiny percentages matter, especially in races decided by mere fractions of a second. Incorporating aerobic work into your training routine can be the secret sauce for conquering that back half of the race with resilience and speed.


Know that your sprint events will be affected If you ignore the aerobic work, and you'll crash in the back half of your race. The research has shown that 20 seconds of all-out effort, like the 50 free swims, the aerobic system contributes to 20% - 25% of the energy for that effort in a race that's always decided by hundreds of a seconds. That 25% is a substantial number."

 

Cheetham, M., Boobis, L., Brooks, S., & Williams, C. (1986). Human muscle metabolism during sprint running. Journal of Applied Physiology, 61(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1986.61.1.54

Dolan, P. and Sargeant, A. (1984). maximal short-term (anaerobic) power output following submaximal exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 05(S 1), S133-S134. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1025977

Gastin, P. (2001). energy system interaction and relative contribution during maximal exercise. Sports Medicine, 31(10), 725-741. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131100-00003

McCutcheon, L., Geor, R., & Hinchcliff, K. (1999). Effects of prior exercise on muscle metabolism during sprint exercise in horses. Journal of Applied Physiology, 87(5), 1914-1922. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.87.5.1914

Muscle metabolism during sprint running" (Bangsbo et al., 1990)



Friday, May 26, 2023

5:06 AM

The Muscular Hypertrophy in Swimming: Unveiling Fitness Training Effects





Introduction:

Swimming is a demanding sport that requires a unique blend of strength, endurance, and technique. Many swimmers strive to enhance their performance through fitness training, and for some, this includes a desire to develop bulkier muscles. However, it is crucial to understand the potential impact of such training on swimmers and their overall performance in the water. This article delves into the key factors that influence the effect of this type of fitness training on swimmers, specifically focusing on the concept of gaining bulky muscles including, weight gain, effects on recovery and Fatigue, range of motion, and body stiffness. Furthermore, we explore the perspective of Tudor O. Bompa, a renowned expert in sports training, and the subsequent implications on swimming ability.

Michael Phelps, the greatest swimmer of all time, achieved unparalleled success in the sport. Phelps possessed a lean muscle body, including an elongated torso and flexible joints, which contributed to his remarkable swimming performance. And also, David Popovici, the world record holder in the 100m freestyle for men, both of them serves as a notable example of swimmers who excel without relying on bulky muscles. Their long, lean physique and emphasis on flexibility demonstrate that muscle mass alone does not guarantee success in swimming. Many age group swimmers aspire to have a muscular look, but it is important to recognize that developing bulky muscles alone does not guarantee improved performance. Instead, swimmers should focus on tailored dry-land training regimens that optimize swimming characteristics and minimize the side effects of muscle hypertrophy. Proper strength training can prevent musculoskeletal degeneration and enhance strength parameters important for swimming. However, injury prevention should be prioritized. Swimmers should aim for the fluidity of movement, which entails moving through the water with ease and efficiency. Kinematic analyses provide valuable insights into swimmers' adaptations to the dynamic aquatic environment.


Understanding Bulk Muscles (Muscular Hypertrophy) in Swimming:

Bulky muscles are typically associated with bodybuilding and weightlifting rather than swimming. Swimmers often prioritize a lean and streamlined physique to minimize resistance in the water. However, some swimmers may believe that increased muscle mass will enhance their performance by providing additional power and speed. It is essential to recognize that bulking up may come at the cost of compromising other vital aspects of swimming technique, such as hydrodynamics and agility.


Effects of Gaining Weight from Bulky Muscles on Swimming (Weight Gain and Performance):

Gaining weight from bulky muscles can impact swimming in several ways. First, the additional muscle mass increases overall body weight, which can affect buoyancy and increase drag in the water. Swimmers with bulkier muscles may find it more challenging to maintain a streamlined body position and may experience increased resistance, hampering their efficiency and speed. Secondly, the added weight can impact the coordination and ability to move through the water with ease and efficiency (fluidity of movement), potentially hindering the execution of precise and efficient swimming strokes. Swimmers must carefully evaluate the tradeoff between muscle mass and weight gain to maintain optimal performance. it is crucial to evaluate the tradeoffs involved. While increased muscle mass can provide some advantages in terms of power, it must be balanced with the potential drawbacks mentioned above. Swimmers need to find a delicate equilibrium between strength, agility, and hydrodynamics to optimize their performance in the water. Achieving this balance requires meticulous training programs and the guidance of experienced coaches who can tailor workouts to individual swimmers' needs.

 

Effects on Recovery and Fatigue:

Recovery is a crucial aspect of any training regimen, enabling swimmers to adapt and improve. However, bulky muscles can impact recovery time, as they require adequate rest and nutrition to repair and grow. Swimmers aiming for bulk may need longer recovery periods between intense training sessions, potentially affecting their overall training frequency and progress. Additionally, the increased weight from bulky muscles may contribute to faster fatigue during training or competition. Swimmers may experience a higher metabolic demand and increased oxygen consumption, potentially leading to earlier onset of fatigue. This can limit training volume and intensity, affecting performance during crucial moments.


Impact on Range of Motion and Body Stiffness:

The development of bulky muscles in swimmers can have potential effects on the range of motion and body stiffness. While increased muscle mass can provide advantages in terms of power and force production, it may also pose challenges in maintaining optimal flexibility and fluidity of movement.

Bulky muscles have the potential to restrict the range of motion around joints, particularly if they become excessively tight or inflexible. This limitation can impact a swimmer's ability to perform certain strokes and movements with the desired efficiency and technique. Reduced flexibility may also hinder the swimmer's ability to achieve optimal body positioning and streamline in the water, which are crucial for minimizing drag and maximizing speed.

Moreover, an increase in muscle mass can contribute to a certain level of body stiffness. While some degree of stiffness can be advantageous for generating power, excessive stiffness may impede a swimmer's ability to adapt to the fluid and dynamic nature of the water environment. It can affect their ability to quickly change direction, adjust stroke technique, and maintain optimal body alignment during different phases of swimming.

Maintaining an appropriate balance between muscle size, flexibility, and fluidity of movement is essential for swimmers aiming for optimal performance. Incorporating flexibility training, dynamic stretching, and mobility exercises into the training regimen can help counteract the potential negative effects of bulky muscles on range of motion and body stiffness.


Bompa's Perspective:

Bompa's viewpoint underscores the idea that the primary objective of strength training in sports, including swimming, is not solely to achieve maximal strength or bulkiness. Instead, the focus should be on enhancing specific performance attributes such as power, power endurance, or muscular endurance, which are more directly relevant to the demands of the sport.

For swimmers, the goal of fitness training should align with optimizing power and power endurance in the water. While developing muscle mass can contribute to increased power output, it must be approached strategically, considering the tradeoffs and challenges discussed earlier in the article. Swimmers aiming for bulky muscles should carefully evaluate how such training aligns with their specific swimming goals and the need for power and power endurance.

By incorporating Bompa's perspective, swimmers and coaches can better understand the overarching objective of strength training in sports and tailor their training programs accordingly. Maximizing power, power endurance, or muscular endurance becomes the focal point, ensuring that the pursuit of bulky muscles is not disconnected from the specific performance requirements of swimming.


Conclusion:

Fitness training plays a crucial role in enhancing a swimmer's performance, but the effect of such training on swimmers aiming for bulky muscles requires careful consideration. While bulky muscles may offer certain benefits in terms of power, they can also pose challenges related to hydrodynamics, weight, fluidity of movement, recovery & fatigue, and range of motion. Swimmers aiming for bulk should carefully consider the impact on power, recovery, and fatigue. Striking a balance between muscle mass, recovery time, and fatigue levels is essential to optimize performance in the water. Incorporating flexibility training and considering the principles highlighted by Bompa can help swimmers tailor their training programs effectively. By understanding and evaluating these factors, swimmers can make informed decisions regarding their training goals and ultimately enhance their overall swimming performance.

 

References:

1. Wilke, J., Müller, A. L., Godecke, T., Dörmann, U., & Vogt, L. (2019). High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypoxia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine, 49(11), 1725-1746. doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01134-z

2. Bonetti, D. L., Hopkins, W. G., & Kilding, A. E. (2016). High-Intensity Interval Training: Performance and Adaptation. Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1449-1470. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0485-4

3. Esteve-Lanao, J., Rhea, M. R., & Fleck, S. J. (2008). Resistance Training in Swimming. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(3), 688-694. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a1d47

4. Tavares, F., Simões, F., & Figueiredo, P. (2019). Strength Training in Swimming: A Brief Review. Journal of Human Kinetics, 67(1), 177-186. doi:10.2478/hukin-2019-0030

5. Blagrove, R. C., Howatson, G., & Hayes, P. R. (2018). Effects of Strength Training on the Physiological Determinants of Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1117-1149. doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x

6. Peeling, P., Binnie, M. J., Goods, P. S. R., Sim, M., & Burke, L. M. (2019). Evidence-Based Supplements for the Enhancement of Athletic Performance. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 29(2), 178-187. doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0282

7. Miller, M. G., Berry, D. C., Bullard, S. A., Gilders, R. M., & Reese, C. M. (2020). Resistance Training for Hypertrophy in Collegiate Swimmers: A Case Study. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(1), 16-21. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002733

8. Gourgoulis, V., Aggeloussis, N., Antoniou, P., & Mavromatis, G. (2003). The Effect of Static and Dynamic Stretching Exercises on the Fascicle Length and the Isometric Moment of Force Production of the Short Finger Flexors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(3), 213-220. doi:10.1080/0264041031000070857

9. Fletcher, I. M., & Jones, B. (2004). The Effect of Different Warm-up Stretch Protocols on 20 Meter Sprint Performance in Trained Rugby Union Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(4), 885-888. doi:10.1519/14455.1

10. Zajac, A., Chalimoniuk, M., Gołaś, A., & Krol, P. (2018). Effects of Resistance Training on Anaerobic Performance of Competitive Swimmers: A Systematic Review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 32(3), 892-903. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002288

11. Larumbe-Zabala, E., Moran-Navarro, R., Etxebarria, N., Mielgo-Ayuso, J., Zubero, J., & Naclerio, F. (2020). Resistance Training Interventions in Swimming: A Systematic Review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(1), 150-167. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003435

12. Zinner, C., Wahl, P., Achtzehn, S., Reed, J. L., & Mester, J. (2017). Acute Hormonal Responses before and after 2 Weeks of HIT in Well Trained Junior Triathletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(8), 589-597. doi:10.1055/s-0043-102411

13. Mikkola, J., Vesterinen, V., Taipale, R., Capostagno, B., Häkkinen, K., & Nummela, A. (2011). Effect of Resistance Training Regimen on Maximum Strength, Muscle Size, Power and Balance in Collegiate Throwers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(8), 773-779. doi:10.1080/02640414.2011.560439

14.   Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. (2019). Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.

 

15.   Platanou, T. (2017). The Physiology of Swimming: Insights to Improve Performance. Sports Medicine - Open, 3(1), 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-017-0105-0.

 

16.   https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-022-00410-5

Effect of Different Types of Strength Training on Swimming Performance in Competitive Swimmers: A Systematic Review | Sports Medicine – Open

 

17.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214624/

Effect of Dry-Land Core Training on Physical Fitness and Swimming Performance in Adolescent Elite Swimmers - PMC – NCBI

 

18.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100337/

Strength Training in Swimming - PMC – NCBI

 

19.   https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-019-0221-0

The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature | Sports Medicine - Open

Friday, April 7, 2023

12:08 PM

The Effects of Detraining in Swimming II


Swimming demands physical fitness, skill, and mental fortitude, with athletes training for hours daily to better their performance. But what happens when they take a break from training? Detraining is the loss of previously attained adaptations due to decreased or no training (Mujika & Padilla, 2000). 

Commonly a four-week hiatus is allowed for top swimmers to go through detraining-related studies (Mujika & Padilla, 2000). Detraining can lead to a decrease in swimming performance, energetics and kinematics. 

A research study by Zacca et al. (2019) looked at 400-m front crawl performance related to four weeks of reduced training in age-group swimmers (14-15 years old). It was found that performance dropped by 3.8%, mainly as a result of decreased stroke rate, an uptick in peak blood lactate concentrations, and limited non-swimming specific physical activities during the off-season. The authors suggested that age group swimmers remain physically active while on their break time. Other studies have found similar results with elite male athletes with 200 yards freestyle time increasing by 3.6% after 4 weeks without training (Costill et al., 1985) and VO2 max declining by 8% after reducing training to just one session per week (Neufer et al., 1987). 

Even body composition can be impacted: Almeras et al.’s study revealed that elite female swimmers gained 4.8 kg of body weight and 4 kg of body fat after two months without any training period. This type of change may not be ideal for good swimming performance as increased fat can cause drag and effects the buoyancy in the water.

To summarize, detraining has negative impacts on swimming performance, energetics and kinematics and should be avoided or at least minimized whilst keeping some level of physical activity during off-season times.


References

- Almeras N., Lemieux S., Bouchard C., Tremblay A., Despres J.P., Theriault G., Allard C., Leblanc C., & J-P Thibault M.C. (1997). Impact of a 2-month swimming cessation on diet and body composition in elite female swimmers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , 29(5), S113.

- Costill D.L., Thomas R., Robergs R.A., Pascoe D., Lambert C., Barr S., & Fink W.J. (1985). Adaptations to swimming training: influence of training volume. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , 17(3), 371-377.

- Mujika I., & Padilla S. (2000). Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part I: short term insufficient training stimulus. Sports Medicine , 30(2), 79-87.

- Neufer P.D., Costill D.L., Fielding R.A., Flynn M.G., & Kirwan J.P. (1987). Effect of reduced training on muscular strength and endurance in competitive swimmers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , 19(5), 486-490.

- Zacca R., Toubekis A., Freitas L., Silva A.F., Azevedo R., Vilas-Boas J.P., Pyne D.B., Castro F.A.D.S., & Fernandes R.J. (2019). Effects of detraining in age-group swimmers performance, energetics and kinematics. Journal of Sports Sciences , 37(13), 1490-1498.

 

Sunday, January 1, 2023

8:14 AM

Types of training periodization

   



What are the types of training periodization?

Periodization in swimming refers to the systematic planning and organization of training in order to optimize performance and minimize the risk of injury. This typically involves dividing the training year into specific periods or "blocks" with each block focusing on different aspects of training such as endurance, strength, power, or speed. The goal of periodization is to progressively increase the intensity and volume of training over time, while also allowing for periods of rest and recovery in order to allow the body to adapt to the increased demands being placed on it. Periodization can be used to plan training for both competitive and non-competitive swimmers and can be tailored to the specific needs and goals of the individual athlete. 

There are several types of periodization that can be used in swimming training, and dryland for swimming

Please keep in mind that this is a broad overview and that the specific details of how each type of periodization is implemented may vary depending on the needs and goals of the individual swimmer.

Linear periodization: linear periodization is a type of training approach that involves gradually increasing the intensity and volume of training over a specific period of time in a linear fashion. It is often used in strength and conditioning programs and can be applied to a variety of sports, including swimming. Linear periodization typically involves organizing training into distinct phases, each of which focuses on a specific goal or adaptation. This type of periodization can be an effective approach for improving physical fitness and performance in swimming. Still, it is important to note that it may not be the best approach for all athletes or all goals.

Undulating periodization: Involves fluctuations in training intensity and volume from one training session to the next. This type of periodization allows for a greater variety of training stimuli, which can be beneficial for experienced swimmers who may need more variety in their training to continue improving.


Block periodization: Involves dividing the training year into specific blocks, each with a specific focus (e.g. endurance, strength, speed). This type of periodization can be useful for targeting specific areas of improvement and for allowing for more intense training periods followed by periods of rest and recovery.

Conjugate periodization: Involves training different physical qualities (e.g. strength, speed) simultaneously, rather than focusing on one aspect at a time. This type of periodization can be a more advanced approach that requires careful planning and coordination.

Microcycle periodization: Involves dividing the training week into smaller units, such as daily workouts or even individual sessions. This type of periodization allows for more precise and frequent adjustments to be made to training intensity and volume, based on the swimmer's progress and recovery.

Mesocycle periodization: Involves dividing the training year into longer blocks, such as 4-6 week cycles. Each mesocycle may have a specific focus, such as endurance or strength, and may involve progressively increasing intensity and volume over the course of the cycle.

Macrocycle periodization: Involves dividing the training year into even longer blocks, such as an entire competitive season. The focus of each macrocycle may vary, depending on the specific goals and needs of the swimmer.

Functional periodization: Involves organizing training around specific functional movements or muscle groups, rather than focusing on specific physical qualities. The goal of this type of periodization is to improve overall movement efficiency and performance, rather than targeting specific muscle groups.

Reverse periodization: a training approach that involves starting with high-intensity training and gradually decreasing intensity over time. This is in contrast to traditional linear periodization, which involves starting with low intensity and gradually increasing intensity over time. Reverse periodization is often used with advanced or experienced athletes who may benefit from a more intense training stimulus in the early stages of their training cycle, followed by a period of reduced intensity and volume as they approach competition.


Non-linear periodization: Involves a more varied and unpredictable approach to training, with fluctuations in intensity and volume from one training session to the next. This can be useful for experienced swimmers who may benefit from a more diverse range of training stimuli.

Traditional periodization: Involves dividing the training year into distinct phases, such as a preparatory phase, a competitive phase, and a transition phase. Each phase may have a specific focus and may involve progressively increasing or decreasing intensity and volume.


Competitive periodization: Involves organizing training around specific competitions or events. The focus of training may shift based on the specific goals and needs of the swimmer leading up to the event.

Developmental periodization: Involves organizing training around the specific needs and goals of developing swimmers, such as those who are just starting out in the sport or who are still in the early stages of their careers. The focus of training may be on building a strong foundation of basic skills and techniques, rather than on peak performance.

Individualized periodization: Involves tailoring training to the specific needs and goals of the individual swimmer. This may involve a combination of different types of periodization and may be adjusted based on the swimmer's progress and recovery.

Cyclical periodization: Involves organizing training around specific cycles or phases, such as a preparatory phase, a competitive phase, and a transition phase.

Undulating linear periodization: Involves a combination of linear and undulating periodization, with fluctuations in intensity and volume from one training session to the next within a larger framework of gradually increasing intensity and volume over time.


Daily periodization: Involves organizing training around daily workouts or individual sessions, with the goal of optimizing performance and recovery on a day-to-day basis.

Triphasic periodization: Involves organizing training around three distinct phases, each with a specific focus on a different aspect of training (e.g. strength, power, speed). This type of periodization may involve a combination of different training methods and may be useful for targeting specific areas of improvement.

Priority periodization: Involves prioritizing certain aspects of training over others, based on the specific needs and goals of the swimmer. For example, a swimmer who is preparing for a long-distance event may prioritize endurance training over speed work.

52 weeks of training periodization for a world-class 400 m-IM with three distinctive major competitions.

Polarized periodization: Involves focusing on low-intensity and high-intensity training, with the goal of optimizing the benefits of both types of training. This type of periodization may be particularly useful for improving endurance performance in sports such as swimming.


it is important to note that the type of periodization that is best for a given swimmer will depend on their individual needs and goals, as well as their experience and training history. It is important to work with a coach or sports performance specialist to develop a training plan that is tailored to your specific needs and goals.

 

Here are some references that may be helpful in learning more about the various types of periodization that can be used in swimming training:

I hope these references are helpful in learning more about the various types of periodization that can be used in swimming training.

Linear periodization:

Fleck, S. J., & Kraemer, W. J. (1987). Designing resistance training programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Undulating periodization:

Rhea, M. R., Alvar, B. A., Burkett, L. N., & Ball, S. D. (2003). A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 17(1), 82-87.

Rhea, M. R., Alvar, B. A., Burkett, L. N., & Ball, S. D. (2004). A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(2), 357-362.

Block periodization:

Issurin, V. (2010). Block periodization versus traditional training theory: A review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9, 7-17.

Issuing, V. (2018). New horizons for the method of blocked training. Sports Medicine, 48(3), 467-480.

Conjugate periodization:

Siff, M. C. (2004). Supertraining (6th ed.). Denver, CO: Supertraining Institute.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Microcycle periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Mesocycle periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Macrocycle periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Functional periodization:

Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2010). Functional periodization: The use of special strength training phases to optimize functional performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(10), 2857-2864.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Reverse periodization:

Stone, M. H., O'Bryant, H. S., & Garhammer, J. (eds.) (1981). Weightlifting: A scientific approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Non-linear periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Traditional periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Daily undulating periodization (DUP)

Rhea, M. R., Alvar, B. A., Burkett, L. N., & Ball, S. D. (2004). A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(2), 357-362.

Rhea, M. R., Alvar, B. A., Burkett, L. N., & Ball, S. D. (2005). A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(3), 647-652.

Competitive periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Developmental periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Individualized periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Cyclical periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Undulating linear periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Daily periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Triphasic periodization:

Contreras, B., & Haff, G. G. (2016). Triphasic training: A systematic approach to elite strength and power development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Contreras, B., & Haff, G. G. (2018). Triphasic training: A systematic approach to elite power development. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 40(5), 13-20.

Priority periodization:

Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2009). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Kraemer, W. J. (2006). Science and practice of strength training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Polarized periodization:

Seiler, S., & Hetlelid, K. J. (2015). Training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: Is there evidence for an "optimal" distribution? Sports Medicine, 45(2), 189-206.

Seiler, S., & Kjerland, G. O. (2006). Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: Is there a "sweet spot"? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 16(1), 49-56.

González-Ravé JM, Pyne DB, Del Castillo JA, González-Mohíno F, Stone MH. Training periodization for a world-class 400 meters individual medley swimmer. Biol Sport. 2022 Oct;39(4):883-888. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.109954. Epub 2021 Nov 10. PMID: 36247944; PMCID: PMC9536385.


Saturday, July 18, 2020

12:06 AM

Importance Of Streamline



In the beginning, it's a good study to end the argument about the streamline head position as for so many years the coaches asked there swimmers to tight there streamline and some of them highlight the head position must be in the middle and the need to squees their arms against the ears and the others highlighted Michele Phelps Hyperd streamline we the head down before we discuss this study we need to explain what is The term “passive drag” relates to the hydrodynamic resistance forces that occur when a swimmer remains in a stable position and is not moving any part of the body. 


this study has been done on A total of ten male swimmers (age: 21 ± 2 years; body height: 1.80 ± 0.06 m; body mass: 75.9 ± 6.9 kg) participated in this study after giving their informed consent. All of the swimmers were regional-level and had at least 10 years of competitive swimming experience. The investigation was performed during the winter of 2014 when the swimmers were in the competition period.

Results:

Regarding the swimmer’s head position, passive drag was found to be significantly lower in with the arms in front of the head for the Head Down and Head in Middle than the Head-Up at all speeds. No differences were observed in passive drag between the Head Down and Head in Middle at all speeds. The statistical analysis revealed that with the arms alongside the body (arm down), the significant highest values of passive drag were only in the Head-Up rather than in the Head Down at the two fastest speeds (1.7 and 1.9 m/s). However, the pairwise comparison showed no significant differences for the Head in Middle rather than for the Head-Up and Head Down at all speeds. 


The results show a reduction of 4–5.2% in average passive drag when the head was down or aligned with the swimmer’s arms alongside the body(Arm down), in comparison to the head-up position. There was a major decrease of 10.4–10.9% in passive drag when the head was down or aligned with the swimmer’s arms above the swimmer’s head (in streamline position). it shows in the graph with the yellow dot.

Conclusion:

Regarding to this study and the related studies the in passive drag position, the streamline with the head down is less drag by 10.4 - 10.9% but also we have to mention that in the speed of 1.9 the streamlined with the head down and the head between the arms almost equal. we have to focus on the streamline in our day to day workouts. And don't forget that 30% of all the races are on the walls for start and turns and the streamline is a valuable key to success in that we need to use and develop.

References:

Cortesi, M., & Gatta, G. (2015). Effect of The Swimmer’s Head Position on Passive Drag. Journal of Human Kinetics, 49, 37 - 45.

Study reference:

Bixler B, Pease D, Fairhurst F. The accuracy of computational fluid dynamics analysis of the passive drag of a male swimmer. Sports Biomech. 2007;6:81–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bulgakova NZh, Afanasev VZ, Makarenko LP, Morozov SN, Popov OI, Chebotareva IV. Swimming. Moscow: Physical Culture and Sport; 2001. p. 400. [Google Scholar]

Chollet D, Seifert L, Boulesteix L, Carter M. Arm to leg coordination in elite butterfly swimmers. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27:322–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cortesi M, Fantozzi S, Di Michele R, Zamparo P, Gatta G. Passive drag reduction using full-body swimsuits: the role of body position. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(11):3164–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Gatta G, Zamparo P, Cortesi M. Effect of swim cap model on passive drag. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(10):2904–2908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Gatta G, Cortesi M, Fantozzi S, Zamparo P. Planimetric frontal area in the four swimming strokes: Implications for drag, energetics, and speed. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;39:41–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guimaraes A, Hay J. A mechanical analysis of the grab starting technique in swimming. Int J Sport Biomech. 1985;1:25–35. [Google Scholar]

Havriluk R. Variability in measurement of swimming forces: a meta-analysis of passive and active drag. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;78(2):32–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Lyttle AD, Blanksby BB, Elliot BC, Lloyd DG. The effect of depth and velocity on drag during the streamlined glide. J Swim Res. 1998;13:15–22. [Google Scholar]

Marinho DA, Reis VM, Alves FB, Vilas-Boas JP, Machado L, Silva AJ, Rouboa AI. Hydrodynamic drag during gliding in swimming. J Appl Biomech. 2009;25(3):253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Marinho D, Barbosa T, Rouboa A, Silva A. The hydrodynamic study of the swimming gliding : a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. J Hum Kin. 2011;29:80–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Miyashita M, Tsunoda R. Swimming medicine IV. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1978. pp. 395–401. [Google Scholar]

Mollendorf JC, Termin AC, Oppenheim E, Pendergast DR. Effect of swimsuit design on passive drag. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1029–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Naemi R, Sanders R. A “hydrokinematic” method of measuring the glide efficiency of a human swimmer. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(6):061016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pendergast DR, Mollendorf JC, Cuviello R, Termin AC. Application of theoretical principles to swimsuit drag reduction. Sports Eng. 2006;9:65–76. [Google Scholar]

Polidori G, Taiar R, Fohanno S, Mai TH, Lodini A. Skin-friction drag analysis from the forced convention modeling in simplified underwater swimming. J Biomech. 2006;39(13):2535–2541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Popa CV, Zaidi H, Arfaoui A, Polidori G, Taiar R, Fohanno S. Analysis of wall shear stress around a competitive swimmer using 3D Navier-Stokes equations in CFD. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2011;13:3–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Popa CV, Arfaoui A, Fohanno S, Taıar R, Polidori G. Influence of a postural change of the swimmer’s head in hydrodynamic performances using 3D CFD. Comput Methods Biomech. 2012;0:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Seifert L, Chollet D, Mujika I. World book of swimming: From Science to Performance. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2011. pp. 135–153. [Google Scholar]

Vantorre J, Chollet D, Seifert L. Biomechanical analysis of the swim-start: a review. Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(2):223–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Vilas-Boas JP, Costa L, Fernandes R, Ribeiro J, Figueiredo P, Marinho D, Silva A, Rouboa A, Machado L. Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second glide positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke. J App Biomech. 2010;26(3):324–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Webb PW. Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsion. Ottawa: Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada; 1975. p. 159. [Google Scholar]

Zaidi H, Taıar R, Fohann S, Polidori G. Analysis of the effect of swimmer’s head position on swimming performance using computational fluid dynamics. J Biomech. 2008;41:1350–1358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zamparo P, Capelli C, Termin AB, Pendergast DR, di Prampero PE. The effect of the underwater torque on the energy cost, drag, and efficiency of front crawl swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol O. 1996;73:195–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zamparo P, Gatta G, Capelli C, Pendergast DR. Active and passive drag, the role of trunk incline. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:195–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zamparo P, Capelli C, Pendergast DR. Energetics of swimming: A hystorical perspective. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;111:367–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Zatsiorsky V. Biomechanics in Sport. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2000. pp. 184–204. [Google Scholar]

Saturday, July 11, 2020

11:42 PM

RAISING A SUCCESSFUL KID IN SWIMMING



By: C.Moemen Arafa
Today we will discuss a few pieces of Advice for young children to be successful in swimming or any other sports. First of all, in my belief as a coach, the parents have More Control on their Kids more than us and with few tips that we will discuss in this article will help you to understand More About Sport, especially Swimming.
you need to know that building a successful Swimmer or an Athlete in Any Sport Takes time. so Accept that progress in any sport takes at least 7 -10 years after puberty in most sports for any athlete to achieve their full potential.

Tuesday, May 19, 2020

11:12 AM

The Effect of Detaining on Swimmers


After five months of intense training, a study of eight male swimmers was conducted within four weeks of no training. The performance time was not affected. However, the losses in training aspects during that period were:

  • Muscle glycogen decreased from 153 to 93 mm / kg;
  • High blood lactate level from 4.2 mm / l to 9.7 mm / l. After swimming 200 yards, 90% of the best time
After only one week, a decrease in the oxidative potential of swimmers' muscles and a greater disturbance of acid-base balance in the blood after swimming is observed. The study also showed that complete conditioning may be completely lost within six to eight weeks after stopping training. What has been gained from conditioning in 5 months can be lost in a period of 6 to 8 weeks, and factors of loss of adaptation appear in the first week to 4 weeks, which is a short period.